好的,没问题!我们之间的互动就从一次实战开始。
下面我将严格按照你给我的《雅思 Task 1 高分万能模板》中的四段式结构和语言点,为你写一篇符合“高中生水平、简洁、7.5 分目标”的范文。
The provided pie chart illustrates the primary global causes of land degradation, while the table gives data on how these factors affected North America, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation were the three principal causes of land degradation worldwide. Furthermore, Europe experienced the highest level of land degradation among the three regions, and the main cause of this problem varied significantly from one region to another.
Looking at the details, Europe had the largest proportion of degraded land at 23%. This was mainly caused by deforestation, which accounted for 9.8% of the degradation, followed by over-cultivation and over-grazing at 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. In contrast, North America was the least affected region, with a total of only 5% of its land being degraded, where over-cultivation was the most significant factor (3.3%).
As for Oceania, 13% of its land was degraded in the 1990s. This region was overwhelmingly affected by over-grazing, which was responsible for 11.3% of the damage. This figure is notably higher than the impact from deforestation (1.7%) and over-cultivation, which caused no degradation at all. It is also interesting to note that over-grazing, Oceania’s primary issue, was also the single biggest cause of land degradation globally (35%).
(字数: 201 词)
你看,这篇范文完全就是用我们前面学习的“乐高积木”搭建起来的:
The provided pie chart illustrates... while the table gives data on...
句型,成功改写了原题。In contrast
来突出对比。overwhelmingly affected by over-grazing
(绝大部分受过度放牧影响),还聪明地将表格中的信息与饼图的全球信息联系起来,这是一个很好的加分点。primary
, principal
, proportion
, significant
这样的核心词汇。respectively
(分别地),In contrast
(相反),As for
(至于) 等实用连接词。while
连接两个从句,增加了句式多样性。这篇范文证明了,我们不需要华丽的辞藻,只需要清晰的逻辑结构和准确的语言表达,就完全可以写出一篇高分作文。
怎么样,通过这个例子,你对如何使用这个写作框架是不是更有感觉了?接下来,你想学习一个新的知识点,还是想挑战另一个题目,由我来引导你进行头脑风暴和搭建大纲呢?
好的,同学你好。这是一篇非常优秀的雅思 Task 1 范文,我会严格按照专业标准,为你提供一份详细的分析报告。
Overall
, Furthermore
, Looking at the details
, In contrast
, As for Oceania
)使用得恰到好处,使文章的起承转合非常流畅,完全不显生硬。illustrates
, primary/principal causes
, land degradation
, varied significantly
, proportion
, accounted for
, respectively
, overwhelmingly affected
, responsible for the damage
, notably higher
。factors
替换 causes
,用 affected
替换 caused by
等。while
连接的并列句,以及由 which
和 where
引导的定语从句(例如 “This was mainly caused by deforestation, which accounted for 9.8%…“),这充分展示了你驾驭复杂句的能力。整体逻辑框架: 文章逻辑堪称完美。从引言(介绍图表)到概述(总结核心趋势),再到主体段落(分组对比关键数据),最后以一个画龙点睛的对比收尾,整个论证过程清晰、层层递进,极具说服力。
引言 (Introduction): 引言部分简洁明了,成功地转述了题目的核心信息——图表所展示的内容,即全球土地退化的原因以及这几个原因在三大洲的具体影响。
主体段落分析 (Body Paragraphs):
结论 (Conclusion): 对于 Task 1 来说,一个强有力的概述段已经起到了总结作用,因此不必再写一个独立的结论段。本文的结尾句(”It is also interesting to note that…“)既是对细节的补充,也起到了总结和点睛的作用,处理得非常得当。
你的文章已经非常出色,几乎不需要修改。下面的“优化建议”更多是提供一些同义的高级表达方式,以供参考和学习,而非指出原文有误。
原句 (Original Sentence) | 修改后 (Revised Sentence) | 分析与建议 (Analysis & Suggestions) |
---|---|---|
The provided pie chart illustrates the primary global causes of land degradation, while the table gives data on how these factors affected North America, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s. | The provided pie chart illustrates the primary global causes of land degradation, while the accompanying table specifies how these factors impacted three continents—North America, Europe, and Oceania—during the 1990s. | 分析: 原句已经非常完美。修改建议只是提供了更丰富的表达,例如用 accompanying table (附带的表格) 替代 the table ,用 specifies 和 impacted 增强动词表现力,用破折号来引出三个地区,使句子结构更丰富。 |
Overall, it is clear that over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation were the three principal causes of land degradation worldwide. | Overall, over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation clearly stood out as the three principal causes of land degradation worldwide. | 分析: 原句的 it is clear that... 结构完全正确且常用。修改后使用了 stood out as (作为…而突出),这是一个更具动态感的表达,让句子更生动。 |
Furthermore, Europe experienced the highest level of land degradation among the three regions, and the main cause of this problem varied significantly from one region to another. | Furthermore, Europe experienced the highest proportion of degraded land among the three regions, with the main cause of this issue varying significantly from one continent to another. | 分析: 原句无懈可击。修改建议将 level 换成了更精确的 proportion ,并将后半句的 and 连接的并列句改为了 with 引导的独立主格结构,这是展现语法多样性的一个好方法。 |
Looking at the details, Europe had the largest proportion of degraded land at 23%. | Turning to the details, Europe possessed the largest proportion of degraded land, at 23%. | 分析: 优秀。Looking at the details 是非常好的开头方式。Turning to the details 是一个同样地道的替换。将 had 换成 possessed 略微提升了词汇的正式度。 |
This was mainly caused by deforestation, which accounted for 9.8% of the degradation, followed by over-cultivation and over-grazing at 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. | This degradation was primarily attributable to deforestation, which accounted for 9.8%, followed by over-cultivation and over-grazing at 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. | 分析: 完美。which 定语从句使用得非常棒。修改建议引入了 was primarily attributable to (主要归因于),这是一个非常高级和书面的表达,可以替代 was mainly caused by 。 |
In contrast, North America was the least affected region, with a total of only 5% of its land being degraded, where over-cultivation was the most significant factor (3.3%). | In contrast, North America was the least affected region, with only 5% of its land degraded in total, where over-cultivation emerged as the most significant factor (3.3%). | 分析: 优秀。where 的使用非常娴熟。修改建议将 emerged as (作为…而出现) 用于替换 was ,使描述更具动态感。 |
As for Oceania, 13% of its land was degraded in the 1990s. | Regarding Oceania, 13% of its land was subject to degradation during the 1990s. | 分析: 优秀。Regarding 是 As for 的一个很好的同义替换。was subject to degradation (遭受退化) 是一个非常地道的搭配,可以替换 was degraded 。 |
This region was overwhelmingly affected by over-grazing, which was responsible for 11.3% of the damage. | This continent was overwhelmingly impacted by over-grazing, which was responsible for 11.3% of the total degradation. | 分析: 优秀。Overwhelmingly (压倒性地) 这个副词用得非常出彩。修改建议将 region 换成 continent 以避免重复,并将 damage 换成更精确的 total degradation 。 |
This figure is notably higher than the impact from deforestation (1.7%) and over-cultivation, which caused no degradation at all. | This figure was markedly higher than the impact of deforestation (1.7%) and over-cultivation, the latter of which caused no degradation whatsoever. | 分析: 优秀。notably higher 用得很好。修改建议使用了 markedly higher 作为同义替换。同时,the latter of which 的用法可以更清晰地指代 over-cultivation ,whatsoever 结尾可以加强语气。 |
It is also interesting to note that over-grazing, Oceania’s primary issue, was also the single biggest cause of land degradation globally (35%). | Crucially, over-grazing, Oceania’s primary issue, also ranked as the single biggest cause of land degradation on a global scale (35%). | 分析: 这是一个完美的结尾句,展现了作者的分析能力。修改建议用 Crucially (至关重要的是) 替代了略显口语化的 It is also interesting to note that ,并用 ranked as (位列为) 和 on a global scale (在全球范围内) 提供了更书面的表达方式。 |
(This version incorporates the suggestions to showcase a slightly more varied and formal style, while the original is already at a Band 9 level.)
The provided pie chart illustrates the primary global causes of land degradation, while the accompanying table specifies how these factors impacted three continents—North America, Europe, and Oceania—during the 1990s.
Overall, over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation clearly stood out as the three principal causes of land degradation worldwide. Furthermore, Europe experienced the highest proportion of degraded land among the three regions, with the main cause of this issue varying significantly from one continent to another.
Turning to the details, Europe possessed the largest proportion of degraded land, at 23%. This degradation was primarily attributable to deforestation, which accounted for 9.8%, followed by over-cultivation and over-grazing at 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. In contrast, North America was the least affected region, with only 5% of its land degraded in total, where over-cultivation emerged as the most significant factor (3.3%).
Regarding Oceania, 13% of its land was subject to degradation during the 1990s. This continent was overwhelmingly impacted by over-grazing, which was responsible for 11.3% of the total degradation. This figure was markedly higher than the impact of deforestation (1.7%) and over-cultivation, the latter of which caused no degradation whatsoever. Crucially, over-grazing, Oceania’s primary issue, also ranked as the single biggest cause of land degradation on a global scale (35%).
这是一篇堪称教科书级别的雅思 Task 1 范文。你的文章在任务回应、逻辑结构、词汇运用和语法准确性四个维度上都表现得近乎完美。你不仅准确地描述了数据,更重要的是,你展示了出色的信息筛选、对比和整合能力,特别是概述段的精准提炼和结尾处对区域与全球数据的关联分析,这些都是获得顶级分数的关键。
对于其他正在备考的同学来说,你的这篇文章提供了几个非常宝贵的学习点:
which
引导的非限定性定语从句来补充信息(如 “…deforestation, which accounted for 9.8%…“),是让你的语法水平脱颖而出的利器。它能让你的句子更流畅,信息密度更高。继续保持这样的水准,你在雅思写作中取得高分将是必然的结果。祝贺你!
好的,没问题!我们马上就用这个具体的题目来实践一下。
你提出了一个非常好的练习要求:主体段第一段写饼图(全局),第二段写表格(局部)。这是一个非常清晰且有逻辑的结构。
下面,我为你准备了一篇完全符合你要求的范文。这篇范文严格遵循我们之前讨论的四段式结构,语言简洁清晰,目标分数 7.5 分,字数也控制在 200 词以内。
The provided pie chart illustrates the main causes of worldwide land degradation, while the table gives data on how three specific regions were affected by these causes.
Overall, it is clear that over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation are the three dominant causes of land degradation globally. Furthermore, of the three regions shown, Europe suffers from the highest level of land degradation, while the primary cause varies significantly among them.
Looking at the global picture, over-grazing is the single most significant factor, accounting for 35% of land degradation. This is followed closely by deforestation and over-cultivation, which are responsible for 30% and 28% respectively. All other causes combined constitute a much smaller proportion, at just 7%.
Turning to the regional data, Europe has the largest percentage of degraded land at 23%, with deforestation being the main culprit (9.8%). In contrast, Oceania’s land degradation is almost entirely caused by over-grazing, which makes up 11.3% of its 13% total. North America is the least affected region (5% total), where over-cultivation is the primary driver at 3.3%.
(单词数: 182)
你看,这篇范文是不是感觉逻辑特别清晰,读起来很顺畅?我们来拆解一下,看看它是如何做到“用简单的语言,填充有逻辑的结构”的:
引言 (Introduction):
The provided pie chart illustrates..., while the table gives data on...
概述 (Overview):
over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation are the three dominant causes...
(三大原因是主导)Europe suffers from the highest level...
(欧洲受影响最重) ...the primary cause varies significantly...
(各地区主要原因不同)主体段一 (Body Paragraph 1 - 描述饼图):
35% -> 30% -> 28% -> 7%
)。accounting for
, responsible for
, constitute
这些描述占比的常用动词,非常地道。主体段二 (Body Paragraph 2 - 描述表格):
In contrast
来凸显欧洲和澳洲的不同。同时点出了北美是 the least affected region
(受影响最小的地区)。11.3% of its 13% total
,这样的数据引用非常精准。这篇范文完全可以作为你学习的模板。你可以试着模仿它的结构和用词,自己也写一遍。
接下来我们做什么?你是想基于这篇范文问一些具体的问题(比如某个词为什么这么用),还是想挑战一个全新的图表题呢?我随时准备好了。
好的,同学,你的这篇雅思小作文(Task 1)写得非常出色。作为你的雅思写作老师,我将为你提供一次全面细致的批改。请仔细阅读以下反馈,希望能帮助你更好地理解评分标准并巩固你的写作优势。
Overall
, Furthermore
, Looking at the global picture
, This is followed closely by
, Turning to the regional data
, In contrast
等一系列衔接词和短语,使得段落之间和句子之间的过渡自然流畅。illustrates
, dominant causes
, significantly
, single most significant factor
, accounting for
, responsible for
, constitute
, main culprit
, primary driver
等词汇,这些词都非常贴切语境。causes
对应 reasons
,用 affected by
替换 caused by
。main culprit
和 primary driver
来指代“主要原因”非常灵活生动。while
引导的并列句、that
引导的宾语从句、which
引导的非限制性定语从句,以及现在分词作状语(accounting for...
)等复杂结构。整体逻辑框架: 你的文章逻辑堪称模板。采用了“总-分”的结构,先在概述段给出全局最重要的信息,然后用两个主体段分别深入探讨全局数据和区域数据。这种从宏观到微观的推进方式,逻辑严谨,条理清晰。
引言 (Introduction): 非常高效。第一句话清晰地转述了题目信息,介绍了图表的主题,做到了简洁而全面的概括。
概述段 (Overall Paragraph): 这是你文章最亮眼的部分。你成功地从纷繁的数据中提炼出了最重要的两个宏观趋势:1)全球范围内的三大主因;2)三个地区中,欧洲退化比例最高,且每个地区的主因各不相同。这充分展示了你分析和总结信息的能力。
主体段落分析 (Body Paragraphs):
35% > 30% > 28%
)来描述,使得段落内部非常有条理。In contrast
转折到大洋洲的独特情况(绝大部分由单一原因导致),最后点出退化程度最低的北美及其主因。这种对比写法,极大地增强了文章的分析深度。结论 (Conclusion): 对于雅思 Task 1 来说,一个强有力的概述段(Overall paragraph)已经起到了总结的作用,因此不必再写一个单独的结论段。你的处理方式是完全正确且高效的。
你的文章已经写得非常好了,几乎没有错误。下面的“修改”更多是提供一些可以替换的“备选项”,以展示更多的表达方式,而非纠错。
原句 (Original Sentence) | 修改后 (Revised Sentence) | 分析与建议 (Analysis & Suggestions) |
---|---|---|
The provided pie chart illustrates the main causes of worldwide land degradation, while the table gives data on how three specific regions were affected by these causes. | The provided pie chart illustrates the primary causes of global land degradation, while the accompanying table details how these factors affected three distinct regions. | 分析与建议: 原句已经非常好了。这里的修改仅为展示词汇的多样性。primary 替换 main ,global 替换 worldwide ,accompanying table (旁边的表格) 更具描述性,details 替换 gives data on 更简洁有力,distinct regions 替换 specific regions 也是一个不错的选择。 |
Overall, it is clear that over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation are the three dominant causes of land degradation globally. | Overall, it is clear that over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation are the three dominant causes of land degradation globally. | 分析与建议: 这句话写得非常完美,清晰地概括了核心信息,无需修改。 |
Furthermore, of the three regions shown, Europe suffers from the highest level of land degradation, while the primary cause varies significantly among them. | Furthermore, of the three regions presented, Europe experiences the highest level of land degradation, while the principal cause varies significantly among them. | 分析与建议: 原句准确无误。presented 是 shown 的一个很好的同义词。experiences 可以用来替换 suffers from ,语气稍显客观。principal 是 primary 的高级同义词。这些都是锦上添花的词汇选择。 |
Looking at the global picture, over-grazing is the single most significant factor, accounting for 35% of land degradation. | Looking at the global picture, over-grazing is the single most significant factor, accounting for 35% of land degradation. | 分析与建议: 完美。accounting for... 的用法非常地道,是描述数据的亮点句式。 |
This is followed closely by deforestation and over-cultivation, which are responsible for 30% and 28% respectively. | This is followed closely by deforestation and over-cultivation, which are responsible for 30% and 28% respectively. | 分析与建议: 完美。which 定语从句使用得当,respectively 的位置和用法也完全正确。 |
All other causes combined constitute a much smaller proportion, at just 7%. | All other causes combined constitute a much smaller proportion, at just 7%. | 分析与建议: 简洁明了,词汇 constitute 和 proportion 使用得非常专业。无需修改。 |
Turning to the regional data, Europe has the largest percentage of degraded land at 23%, with deforestation being the main culprit (9.8%). | Turning to the regional data, Europe has the largest percentage of degraded land at 23%, with deforestation being the main culprit at 9.8%. | 分析与建议: 原句几乎完美。唯一的微调建议是去掉括号,直接用 at 9.8% ,这样在学术写作中更常见一些。main culprit (主要元凶)这个词用得很有趣,也很有效,展示了你的词汇灵活性。 |
In contrast, Oceania’s land degradation is almost entirely caused by over-grazing, which makes up 11.3% of its 13% total. | In contrast, Oceania’s land degradation is almost entirely attributable to over-grazing, which makes up 11.3% of its 13% total. | 分析与建议: 原句很好。is attributable to 是 is caused by 的一个非常好的、更正式的替换。这个句子清晰地对比了大洋洲的特殊情况,并且巧妙地将部分数据 (11.3%) 和总数 (13%) 结合在一起,分析得很到位。 |
North America is the least affected region (5% total), where over-cultivation is the primary driver at 3.3%. | North America is the least affected region with a total of 5% degradation, where over-cultivation acts as the primary driver at 3.3%. | 分析与建议: 原句清晰准确。primary driver (主要驱动因素) 和 main culprit 形成了很好的呼应,避免了重复。修改后的版本 with a total of 5% degradation 只是提供了另一种表达方式,acts as 也是一种选择,但原句已经足够优秀。 |
(注:你的原文已接近母语水平,修改后的版本仅为展示更多元的表达方式,而非对原文的否定。)
The provided pie chart illustrates the primary causes of global land degradation, while the accompanying table details how these factors affected three distinct regions.
Overall, it is clear that over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation are the three dominant causes of land degradation globally. Furthermore, of the three regions presented, Europe experiences the highest level of land degradation, while the principal cause varies significantly among them.
Looking at the global picture, over-grazing is the single most significant factor, accounting for 35% of land degradation. This is followed closely by deforestation and over-cultivation, which are responsible for 30% and 28% respectively. All other causes combined constitute a much smaller proportion, at just 7%.
Turning to the regional data, Europe has the largest percentage of degraded land at 23%, with deforestation being the main culprit at 9.8%. In contrast, Oceania’s land degradation is almost entirely attributable to over-grazing, which makes up 11.3% of its 13% total. North America is the least affected region with a total of 5% degradation, where over-cultivation acts as the primary driver at 3.3%.
这是一篇非常优秀的雅思 Task 1 范文。你的文章结构清晰、逻辑严谨、语言流畅准确,完全达到了高分标准。你对图表信息的提炼、组织和呈现能力都非常突出。如果能在考试中稳定发挥出这个水平,取得高分将是必然的。
对于其他同学来说,你的文章有以下几点非常值得学习:
The percentage of X is ...%
。学习你的用法,如:
...over-grazing is the single most significant factor, **accounting for 35%**...
...deforestation and over-cultivation, **which are responsible for 30% and 28% respectively**.
...Europe has the largest percentage..., **with deforestation being the main culprit**.
cause
,而是灵活地运用了 dominant causes
, single most significant factor
, main culprit
, primary driver
。这种词汇的丰富性是高分词汇(LR)的体现。继续保持!你已经掌握了雅思 Task 1 的精髓。在接下来的练习中,请继续保持这种清晰的逻辑和高质量的语言输出。